The move towards authoritative
government regimes in the early 21st century is a godsend to
sub-communities that were once in danger of being marginalized. These
sub-communities are dangerous, for sure, as they exist solely for the purpose
of expressing power over other people, though ‘people’ may be stretching
definitions a bit since these sub-communities undoubtedly view non-members as
less than human. Such is the case with the Incel community, a white-male
dominated group hellbent on securing unfettered access to any woman of their
choosing.
To say Incels (involuntary
celibates) are misogynist is an understatement. They have very particular
notions of how the relationship between men and women should be based on the
supposed fact that men are superior to women. This is allegedly evidenced by
the domination of men over women throughout history. But their ideology is a
little more nuanced than that: They despise the idea of ‘whores,’ women who have
had too many sex partners/experience or are sex-workers. Young and preferably
virgin women must make themselves attractive so as to make themselves worthy of
an Incel’s attention. After all, women are shallow, cruel creatures who only
give their attention to the most attractive men and therefore must be punished
for this behavior. Incels blame the changes in Western culture that have
granted women rights and allowed them to pick their own sexual partners,
inevitably leading to women picking more attractive men.
Incels are typically described –
by themselves – as physically unattractive and this is their major obstacle to
securing sex. Since this isn’t their own fault however, they should still be
allowed to secure sex by any other means. It is their belief that it is their biological
right to have sex at will with the chosen object of their desire, despite any
examination of the idea that their biology is what made them ‘unattractive’ in
the first place. Incel ideology quickly falls apart upon even the most cursory
of examinations.
For instance, Incels are adverse
to the idea of being chivalrous (‘white-knighting’) which they see as a façade in
order to obtain a woman’s attention. Of course, holding a door for someone – anyone
– is just the polite thing to do. Instead, Incels are more likely to go out of
their way to dress better or make money, presumably because these are the only
things women are attracted to which again makes women unworthy of being so much
as equal to a man. As I said, subhuman. By logical extension of the Incel
ideology, a man who makes less money than a woman is unworthy of being with
her. But the fact that the woman is even allowed to make more money when for
centuries this has basically been forbidden is what roils Incels. They can’t
stand the idea of a level playing field and people getting by on their merits.
To be fair, much lip service is given to the value of meritocracies but very
few people dare practice it. This is due largely in part to the laziness of
human beings who’d much rather be given what they want than work for it.
Laughably, the alt-right despises such ideas from the alt-left, like free
college tuition, despite benefiting from their own ‘hand-outs’ for so long,
such as unfettered access to women. Again, in being hypocrites, Incels are in
good company at least.
The overriding principle of Incel ideology
is that women are inferior to men, citing pretty much all of history in which
men have physically dominated women. This raises the question that if by some
quirk of evolutionary fate women became stronger than men, men should then be subjugated?
If we continue this line of reasoning, no one should be upset if we’re hiking in
the woods and we get mauled by a bear because the bear is physically superior? But
this rarely happens. Mankind has subjugated the animal kingdom through brains,
not brawn, so it seems difficult to justify the general physical prowess of men
over women as the reason women should be classified as less than human. This,
especially given more and more evidence that many women are just as or even
more physically capable than men in many instances. (I would rather enjoy
watching the average Incel compete against any female American Ninja Warrior.)
If women have come to their current state of being able to choose their own sexual
partners through cunning, then Incels should be doubly kicking themselves for
having never seen it coming. Leave it to blinded-by-frustration-and-rage Incels
to not understand that the current state of women in the West is due to, among
other things, the long-reach of a precious few Renaissance philosophers who
happened to mostly be white. I’m sure white Incels would label them as race
traitors.
Fortunately, few Incels have the
strength of their convictions to go about casually raping women who refuse them
or, as they’ve done in recent years, go on shooting sprees. Unfortunately, they
also don’t have the strength to get out from behind their gaming computers and
phones to learn skills that might make them a valuable member of society and
therefore more attractive. To reiterate, though, Incels are lazy and simply
want what they want handed to them on a silver platter, having done nothing to
earn their station – which is a large part of what has placed them in their predicament.
If an Incel isn’t intelligent enough to see this, what makes them think they’re
worthy of being allowed to have their genes spread?
Solutions have been proposed to
combat Incel ideology and these solutions mostly revolve around ways to avoid
alienating members of society so that they are not prone to radicalization. My
proposals are more practical; there’s masturbation for one. No, it’s not quite
the same but at least no one gets hurt and one can fantasize however brutally
to their heart’s content. They can take masturbation further by purchasing one
of the many high-end sex dolls that are currently one the market, such as
RealDoll ™. Yes, the dolls are only that, but one can do with them as they
please and they will stay young and beautiful forever. Or, Incels can swallow
the pill they would like to women to take and stop refusing to do the things
that make themselves more physically attractive. If that demand is placed on
women, there is no objective reason it should not be placed on a man. (Incels
see this demand they place on women as the right of the ‘superior’ sex but as I’ve
easily shown, this idea is nonsense.)
As I’ve alluded to earlier this is
less about sex than it is about power, where the powerless simple want power
placed in their hands by virtue of some arbitrary fact/accident of birth.
(Again, despite that accident of birth contributing to their undesired state.) While
I certainly understand the burden of feeling powerless, the solution is not to
rush headlong in the exact opposite direction. The solution, in this case, is
not to utilize violence as a means to an end because this means that violence
is okay as a means to any end. Surely an Incel would be opposed to being
sodomized by a physically superior gay man. But that is perfectly okay given the
particulars of their ideology. When one is forced to think about the
consequences of their ideology, it is only then the flaws of that ideology
became apparent.
