The Eleventh the Eleventh, remember the Eleventh…oh, god,
just…STFU. I say that not because September 11, 2001 wasn’t a historical day
for Western civilization or that I consider the deaths of civilians in New York
and D.C. at the hands of terrorists to be trivial. I say STFU because my
American brethren basically haven’t learned a single fucking thing since the
most devastating attack on U.S. soil over a decade ago.
To wake up on September 11th is to know there
will be the obligatory changing of Facebook profile pictures to some patriotic
nut-grabbing machismo fuckshit like “Never Forget!” Never forget what, that the
American government, endorsed by the republic that voted it into office, did
something to upset a bunch of undernourished, mal-televised Muslims? No, no,
no; instead of ever asking, “What the hell did we (as Americans) do to piss off
the Sand People so much?” Americans are content to recall nothing more than
innocent civilians were killed on 9/11 by people with values completely alien
to their own. Of course, that the values of terrorists are completely alien to
a number of Americans – well, conservative Republicans at least – is horseshit.
They attack us, we attack them, they attack us, we attack them…sounds like
shared values to me. No, no; instead of asking what caused 9/11 and waging a
war on the hearts of the enemy or trying to change the circumstances that lead
to the enemy’s hatred, The United States simply retaliates with force and digs
itself in deeper into the Middle East, physically as well as ideologically.
This, of course, causes great surprise among Americans that an enemy who feels
that they’ve nothing to live for but the rewards of martyrdom will attack them
again and keep trying. Indeed, never
forget how fucking stupid Americans are.
I am not saying the victims of September 11th
deserved what they got. Don’t be ridiculous; they were civilians and civilians
are never legitimate targets, although I guess that depends upon your theory of
warfare. (A theory of warfare that should apply to whatever tragedies U.S.
foreign policy may have led to, no?) But being more patriotic about 9/11 is not going to cause the enemy to go
away, it just makes them madder. Terrorists don’t see American patriotism as
resolve and think, “Wow, they’re really motivated. Let’s stop trying to kill
them.” Paying lip-service to one’s patriotism doesn’t do anything to solve
anything on the geo-political stage. It just makes things worse. I’ve said it
before and I’ll say it again, Nationalism is a concept that has really fucked
over everyone who isn’t rich or powerful. (And on so many levels; I’m not just
talking about sending Joe Blow off to war, though that is the most fucked
example).
If you really want to be patriotic and make the terrorists
pay for what happened on 9/11, then by all means enlist and go get ‘em! I’m
behind ya, really I am. Just don’t keep half-assing it. Either kill all them
mother fuckers – I mean, like, the whole fucking Middle East – or STFU and
build some bridges instead of burning them. Either take the gloves all the way
off or send the Middle East a care package full of kittens. Stop being pussies
and have some goddamn conviction on one side of the fence or the other. Just
don’t tell me to, “Never Forget,” because every time you do it, I’m going to
think – I mean, KNOW – you never gave those trivial words a second thought. And
I hate thoughtless schmucks. They wind up being the kind of assholes who fly
planes into building full of regular people.
[Want to play the "Never Forget" game? It's easy! Grab some friends and some shot glasses and every time someone comes up with something that shouldn't be forgotten in relation to 9/11, everyone has to do a shot. For example, Never Forget that since 9/11, it's okay for the NSA to monitor all your communications without any reason! Or, Never Forget that your precious freedom is the freedom to drink as much carcinogenic cola as you want just as long as you don't peacefully protest corporate greed! Obviously, there is no object to the game, much like being 'patriotic' once a year.]
Update: 9/15/13
The Gentleman Tony responded to this entry but Blogger decided his post was
too long to qualify as a comment. Before I post his reaction, I would just like
to say that sometimes I post entries really to amuse just myself, though any
given post will indicate – at least to a small degree – how I actually feel
about some things. Sometimes, there is a lot of sarcasm with my words and I do
realize that people cannot always or even most of the time know when I am being
sincere and when I am not. With that in mind, The Gentleman Tony’s response is
posted first, followed by my response to his response…
The Gentleman Tony: Before I comment on your
blog, I wish to declare that you've been my best human friend for more than
half of my life and will continue to be so. I also wish to acknowledge that,
unlike myself, you have in your lifetime made the ultimate commitment to our
country and, therefore, speak from a unique perspective that the majority of us
Americans do not have. I can also tenuously relate to some of the emotions that
led you to write what you did. However, I do have to dissent with the specifics
of what you said.
In your first paragraph, you assert that Americans have not learned "a
single (expletive) thing since the most devastating attack (ever) on U.S.
soil." I have to disagree. Americans have learned something. They have
learned that they are under imminent danger of a terrorist attack at any time.
Obviously, 9-11 was not the first terrorist attack on U.S. soil and, indeed,
not even the first terrorist attack at the World Trade Center. However, for
those old enough to have recollections of it, the magnitude of the events of
September 11, 2001 will forever remain in the DNA of every American, and will
be involuntarily recalled during any future terrorist attack, whether involving
a shoe bomber, an explosive device planted in the crowd of the most glorious of
all marathon races, or even a failed bungled plot almost comical in its
ineptitude.....if not for the perilous horror that would have occurred if it
had succeeded.
You then discuss "the obligatory changing of Facebook profile pictures
to some patriotic nut-grabbing machismo (B.S.) like 'Never Forget!'" If
you had used the quote "These Colors Don't Run," I could have
possibly bought the preceding characterization but, to me, "Never
Forget" simply means that we should never forget the horrific events of
that day, of the lives that were lost and the absolute heroism of so many on a
day that represents a dividing line in our history. No macho posturing at all.
Now, the question is, what is appropriate behavior come September 11, 2014
and on September 11ths beyond and, to your point about being people
"patriotic once a year," how should we conduct ourselves on days when
the calendar does not read September 11? Is merely posting "Never
Forget", or a variation on that theme, adequate? For some who post and
change their profile pictures on that day, it truly is an honest reflection of
the pain and poignancy that they feel on that anniversary. However, for some,
posting a picture or a social media update telling us to "Never Forget"
is just a clicheous thing to do, typing a two-word phrase inherent with meaning
without thinking about the significance of it at all, and then amplifying this
thoughtlessness later that day by posting a funny video or meme proving that
they were able to persevere through the pain of the anniversary of 9/11 and get
on with their lives, oh, about an hour later. After all, if we actually pause
to remember the tragedy and attempt to understand its implications throughout
the day, the terrorists win. It's not my place, however, to question the
motives of each person who does this. I would encourage you, though, Theory,
not to make broad, sweeping generalizations or speak in absolutes. Not EVERYONE
posts "Never Forget" for the wrong reasons (nor everyone for the
right reasons); your blog does not acknowledge this, and I'll wager more people
do it for the right reasons.
It was once proposed to make 9/11 a Federal holiday, a sort of National Day
of Mourning, and it would have been interesting to see how that would have played
out were that to have been enacted into law. Would it truly be a Day of
Mourning, or would it have been bastardized over the years? Imagine Walmart
having a 9/11 Sale, the official 9/11 Federal holiday falling only on the
second Friday of September (three-day weekend! yay!), regardless of the
calendar day ala Martin Luther King Day, and family picnics. Memorial Day and
Veterans Day (the latter originally called Armistice Day, to commemorate the
end of World War I on the Western Front) were enacted to acknowledge the
service and sacrifice our soldiers made, especially in wars where the
casualties dwarfed the casualties of 9/11, and the majority of American people
do not spend those days going to parades or watching documentaries of American
history, and this I can confirm personally. When I attended a Memorial Day
parade in which my future stepdaughter marched as a Girl Scout ON MEMORIAL DAY,
I didn't exactly need to plop a chair somewhere hours before just to get a good
vantage point of the festivities, and I will never forget the looks of
appreciation veterans gave us just for clapping as we watched them march in a
Memorial Day parade on Memorial Day, and there were few with us. I can do a
better job of appreciating our veterans, we all can. We can do a better job
making our voices heard in matters regarding conditions at V.A. hospitals, the
quality of care for our veterans returning from the Middle East, and survivor
benefits (not to be confused with demanding more funding for the
military-industrial complex). For those who post "Never Forget" on
9/11, how many made their voices heard when First Responders or their surviving
spouses had to go through all kinds of technical loopholes to get the payouts
they deserve? As I said, we can all do a better job but, then again, my profile
picture did not change during 9/11.
As far as what was the proper retaliation for the terrorist attacks of
9/11, yes, absolutely, we should have responded with force. Attempting to learn
"What the hell did we (as Americans) do to piss off the Sand People so
much?,” as you encourage, is all well-and-good (supporting Israel, which I
believe is a moral obligation, is one logical answer), but we absolutely had to
go into Afghanistan because you cannot let over 3,000 people die from a terrorist
attack and become merely introspective. Getting involved in Iraq, a country
without a role in the events of 9/11, is another matter (more anon).
Your concluding suggestion, perhaps somewhat facetiously, of enlistment for
those who wish to be patriotic and make the terrorists pay for 9/11 (forget for
the moment that we have, largely, made those responsible pay for it) betrays
some logical flaws. For one, enlisting does not guarantee where your services
will be allocated. You may wish to enlist with the desire to battle the
Taliban, and find your ass in Iraq or Syria, fighting a battle you may not
believe in. If you wish to fight the terrorists themselves, well, who are they,
and where are they at? Compare this to the advent of United States involvement
in World War II, when we declared war against a country who attacked Pearl
Harbor, whereupon their Axis allies declared war on us. Clearly-defined enemies
with clearly-defined boundaries, and a clear moral imperative for the United
States to defeat them. Thankfully, we did not ask ourselves what we did to piss
off the Japanese so much.
Theory
Parker: The Gentleman Tony said that Americans have in fact
learned something from 9/11, “They have learned that they are under imminent danger of
a terrorist attack at any time.” Attacks are possible, certainly, but the
dangers are quite exaggerated. The propaganda campaign by a media that
understands that fear sells has been quite successful. There is a much greater
chance that I am in danger of getting bit by a shark, struck by lightning, or
attacked by a drunk neighbor than be caught up in a terrorist attack. Still,
yes, as individuals and a nation we should remain vigilant and have greater
situational awareness than is standard-operating-procedure, but let’s not
forget that the two most recent spectacular tragedies, Sandy Hook and the
Boston Marathon bombing, were not perpetrated by rogue/sleeper cells of
terrorists. (Everyone knows it was the Illuminati’s work…THAT’S a joke, btw).
Furthermore, the belief that we are always in imminent danger does mean the
terrorists have won (a matter of degrees, of course) but the belief has
resulted in Americans giving away many of their Constitutional freedoms without
so much as a dull roar. So, if indeed Americans did learn something from 9/11,
what it really learned is that they do not deserve either security or liberty,
to paraphrase a great man. So I concede that Americans may have learned something, but if they did, it wasn’t a lesson
with any good result.
What
lesson should have resulted then? I believe 9/11 should have caused Americans
to think deeply, pause, and reconsider its foreign policies. (After we
retaliated against those responsible, naturally. More on that in a bit.) Unlike, WWII – in which Germany had already declared
war on the U.S. and Japan surprised America by bombing Pearl Harbor because
they were after our resources in SE Asia – 9/11 was the direct result of U.S. foreign
policy in the Middle East, a policy that props up Israel. Whether supporting
Israel is the right or wrong thing to do is largely irrelevant; U.S. policy
makers have long known what results from supporting a Jewish state. As I said
on that very day, 9/11, “I’m surprised this didn’t happen sooner.” Instead of
reconsidering a foreign policy (which is more than just about Israel, duh) that
causes a great number of people in the Middle East to hate America, Americans
go to the polls and continue to vote people into office who will maintain the
status quo, thus perpetuating a fear of imminent attacks upon themselves. While
there may be any number of reasons people don’t act in their own interest, this
particular instance of turning a blind eye to what may potentially be one’s own
destruction, to say nothing of willingly tossing aside liberties thanks to said
elected representatives, is a head-shaker, at least to me.
I do
agree with The Gentleman Tony that it was the correct move to attack Afghanistan
in response to 9/11, certainly. But as always, America stopped short of getting
the job done, so to speak. I personally come from the Sun Tzu school of war,
not that I ever would want to go to war but if I did, which calls for crushing
your enemies completely so you don’t have to worry about them in the future.
Granted, such an approach is usually not practical (for example, the Allies considering
invading Russia after WWII), but when you’ve got the means, you should literally
eradicate your enemies. The current War on Terror is, in my opinion,
pussyfooting around with terrorists for reasons I will not speculate here. At
any rate, the current administrative modus operandi continues to put U.S.
citizens at risk if, again, there really is such imminent danger from
terrorists.
All
that aside, do some people post “Never Forget” to sincerely commemorate the
fallen on 9/11? Absolutely. But I contend that such people are in the minority.
No, instead, the sense I get from people attempting to cry, “Never Forget,” is
maliciousness, that they are never going to forget what them A-rabs did to us
and some day they gonna lynch them a towel head if theys get the chance. Again,
people learning no useful lesson from that fateful day, just “Strike back, and
if they strike us back for striking them back, we’ll strike back again.” Meanwhile,
said people have no real connection to anyone who was actually affected by the
events of 9/11. Perhaps they consider themselves patriots, but as I’ve said,
nationalism – responsible for killing SO many people – is one of the worst
ideas humans have ever come up with.
Do I
hope people aren’t as convoluted as I believe they are? Sure, but at the end of
the day I do not buy the premise that people are basically good; I believe the
opposite. That’s just my opinion, though. I could be wrong.
No comments:
Post a Comment