In May of
2003 William Bennett, then the right-wing poster boy for virtues, was
discovered to be a big time gambler. The trouble wasn’t so much that he’d lost
a boatload of money (estimated to be about five million dollars) but that he
was caught participating in what many religious conservatives consider a vice.
Bennett tried to shrug off his addiction by saying his particular brand of faith
didn’t really discourage gambling, but then went on to say that he’d never
gamble again anyway. Mmm, okay.
Fortunately
for Bennett, that story broke in the middle of particularly terrifying Midwest
weather, the global threat of SARS, and Jay Leno and Katie Couric switching
jobs for a day. Before long, the new Slick Willy was able to return to being a
chubby spokes model for virtues and spewing forth more volumes of biblically confused
morality. Bennett is lucky that Americans are as forgetful as they are
apathetic. Perhaps people like William count on it.
Why do
religious leaders seem to suffer the most from extreme hypocrisy? It may be
that they are more closely scrutinized than the Average Joe, but that is as it
should be. Having been in the military I am strong believer in leading by
example. I do not look up to people who do not set a good example. Yet these
are the religious leaders we’ve been putting up with over the years…
Jesse Jackson
was revealed to have sired a love child and allegedly embezzled money from his
own Rainbow Coalition; Jim Baker commits adultery with Jessica Hahn; Franklin
Graham calls Islam a “wicked and evil religion” while ignoring Christian
history. Pat Robertson blames homosexuals for the September 11th
attacks, as if that was the one thing that really
riled up the terrorists. Then there’s Osama bin Laden, who used Islamic
fundamentalism to inspire incredible homicidal and suicidal violence while he
completely ignored the opportunity to be a spectacular symbol of martyrdom
himself. What a chicken-shit. By the way, when are priests going to stop
abusing little children? Only when we’re looking? Currently, there’s no scandal
involving that slick son-of-a-gun Joel Osteen, but you just know it’s coming.
Why is it
that the people who would have you and I believe they know the path to God
better than we do behave so poorly? The origin of the moral hypocrisy of the
pious may have something to do with the fact that such people are held to
impossibly high standards, which is the logical consequence when one picks
their faith. But I think this is strange because I consider it amazing that
people cling to religion in an attempt to curb themselves of the very behavior
that makes them human in the first place. Have we not learned as a species that
repressing our nature perverts our nature until we have no choice to but to be
hypocrites? You know, religious rules should be rejoined with a disclaimer that
cautions, “Guidelines Only.” I mean, trying not to scream “Oh God!” when you
climax really is impossible. Granted, we don’t want people to get too violent.
It must be considered though that something like violence is a part of
our human nature and its okay when released in a socially acceptable manner, like
rampaging your local downtown district whether or not your team wins the Super
Bowl.
What makes
these scandals worse? In my opinion that would be forgiveness. Perhaps it is
believed that everyone makes mistakes. Yet the mistakes of these particular
leaders are all too common and have caused the public to become jaded to the
point that some kind of deception is completely expected as if these religious
leaders were politicians (refer back to my Joel Osteen line earlier). Oddly,
since monotheists in particular like to believe that God doesn’t like sinners
and lying is a sin, you’d think that religious leaders caught lying or behaving
poorly, thus potentially leading their flock astray, would be more severely
punished by their parishioners than the average church denizen. Believe it or
not though, they are actually the ones most easily forgiven by the public,
never mind that these supposed leaders are the ones who are allegedly pied-piping
us to heaven. What the hell? For the believer, enabling their liars will get
them exactly what they deserve, which is nothing. When religious leaders fail,
it is revealed just how much stock they have invested in their beliefs. Observe
how often they say they will reform only after being caught red-handed.
These
theocratic representatives alone however are not entirely to blame. It seems to
me that the hypocrisy arises from both sides of the playing field. The people
we call upon to be our leaders are characteristically of low moral fiber in
part because it’s largely recognized that assholes are the only ones insecure
enough to put forth the drive and determination required to lord power over
others. Everyone knows it takes two to tango, and somebody has got to be the bitch.
Saying a politician or priest speaks for you therefore practically makes you an
accomplice to all sorts of ghastly behavior.
This also
seems to be why no one is willing to be outraged (or be outraged by a lack of
outrage). Most people point-blank refuse to criticize those whom they have
elected. It’s an admission of guilt or at least of being an accessory. Cripes,
canning the boss or your representative would mean one of us other low-lifes
taking time out of their busy schedule to be an effective and true leader. Save
the world? I’m free on Tuesday I guess, after my massage. Leaders rely on
exactly this kind of attitude to remain in power. Then they become prone to
thinking that they can get away with just about anything. For the most part I’m
sure they do, because the public lets them. Sheep don’t tell wolves what to do.
I’m not going
to say that I’ve never said one thing and then done the opposite. It’s just
that us decent folk don’t go around doing it all the time in a conscious effort
to make a mockery of the beliefs we profess. I’m not shoving beliefs I do not
really believe down other people’s throats. When I make a mistake I am man
enough to admit it. (It just never happens.) Religious leaders on the other
hand might be better off pointing out their flaws to begin with so that their
flocks will avoid any letdown (and an inevitable look-the-other-way). It’s like
a “Get-Out-Of-Jail-Free” card played in advance. This would greatly help
congregations identify with their leaders. Hmm, but I wonder how many leaders
don’t want to be identified with their followers. Ah, now we see what
they think of us.
Just how
badly are religious leaders needed anyway? We might recall that Jesus told his
followers that the kingdom of God was inside of them. But then he also said to
his disciples that they would not taste death before seeing heaven on Earth. Did
he lie? Even in his last moment Jesus seemed to question his father whom it
appeared had forsaken him. When the chips were down, it appeared as if the Son
of Man didn’t believe in God or at least couldn’t believe he’d been abandoned
to such a terrible fate. Do you think a parent who loved you would willingly
allow you to be tortured to death? Holy
hand-grenades, the origin of hypocrisy is right there in the Bible!
There’s a
lesson to learn here and that lesson is you can’t really trust anyone but
yourself to lead yourself, especially when it comes to faith. Sucks, I know. This
has been another disappointing message brought to you by Religion, the proud sponsor
of Fooled You.
No comments:
Post a Comment