Observing
the behavior of my students as they interact with other faculty, it occurred to
me that Millennials are now running with the torch of hypocrisy with absolutely
no hindsight. While the hypocrisy of human beings is nothing new, it seems odd
that it doesn’t occur to our social justice warriors, Millennials, that in
seeking restitution for hurt feelings (whether anyone meant to hurt their
feelings) they take no heed of whose feelings they hurt in the process.
For
example, as Millennials go to war over trivialities such as Halloween costumes,
college
presidents have to give in to whatever demands their students make in
an effort to save their own job. One could scarcely imagine the stress Peter
Salovey, the President of Yale University, recently underwent after a
campus-wide email detailing how students should deal with Halloween costumes
that they deemed offensive. Worse, that situation escalated and in early
November 2015, an incident at Yale saw “…students surround[ed] Nicholas Christakis—husband of Erika [Christakis],
a professor of sociology and medicine, and master of Silliman. One
African-American woman, seemingly speaking for the crowd, told him that his
wife’s email [about Halloween costumes] and his failure to apologize for it
made her feel “unsafe.” When Christakis earnestly explained that he would need
to consider the matter before apologizing, the woman shouted at him, “Be
quiet!”; “Why the f--- did you accept the position!”; “If that’s what you
think, you should step down!”; and “You should not sleep at night! You are
disgusting!” She then turned and walked away” (as reported by Peter Berkowitz).
While Millennials are not going to stand for having their feelings hurt, they
think nothing of how they make anyone other than a Millennial feel.
One would suppose this failure to apply their
ideology equally stems from a lack of shared values. Nonetheless, if the desire
to spare the feelings of Millennials only applies amongst themselves, this is
an indication of a culturally relativist practice, which surely Millennials do
not mind since they go out of their way to respect – almost – all cultures.
The problem is, Millennials don’t respect the
cultures they have the ability to usurp or wrest power from. Millennials
respect, say, the practices of the Islamic State, since they believe all
culture is relative and as such who is to say IS’s murderous tendencies are
wrong. Millennials, however, don’t actually have to ever deal with IS directly.
If they did, they would quickly find out IS has no respect for the belief of
Millennials and getting upset about an email about Halloween costumes would
soon be the least of a Millennial’s worries. And that’s just the thing; if all
cultures should be respected because their practices are relativistic, there is
absolutely no reason for anyone who is not a Millennial to respect the beliefs
or practices of Millennials because to not respect the beliefs of Millennials
is neither right nor wrong. As many liberals before them, Millennials fail to
see this error in their philosophy. As many people before them, Millennials are
blinded by ideology.
And so they go to war against the people they can
control. Using the fact that colleges are for-profit, Millennials battle
against college professors and administrators who don’t want to simply give
them a degree without a student actually working for it or with whom they have
a difference of opinion. Lost on Millennials is the fact that if colleges were
not for-profit, a college administration would never give into their demands.
Millennials get their way not because their demands are reasonable or
philosophically justifiable, but because college administrators are
capitalists. (Also lost on Millennials is that capitalism begets inequality and
they fail to realize this because in actuality a Millennial’s smart phone is
more important to them than social justice.)
But all of this is a symptom of a more pressing
question, one I keep asking for which no Millennial can answer: Why is it more
important to spare a person’s feelings* than to have a reasoned, civil debate
in which we may have to settle for “agreeing to disagree”? If a person falsely
believes that 1 + 1 = 3, why is it worth not
correcting them, because it might hurt their feelings? If an attempt is
made to build a person’s self-esteem by giving them an award for simply showing
up, doesn’t this make it more likely that when that person’s feelings do get
hurt, for whatever reason even by accident, that person is going to be ill
prepared to deal with it? Why do feelings matter more than the analysis of a
situation?
[* By person we should take to mean anyone
that agrees with Millennial ideology or that may disagree with Millennial
ideology but lives outside of the U.S.]
In my opinion, that is, the opinion of a seasoned
thinker experienced in life, I rarely if ever have my feelings hurt because
someone said such-and-such about me. I’ve been called plenty of names and
shouted out and vehemently disagreed with but all these things amount to are
words. Words by themselves have no power. All power lies with the person
hearing the word. In order to be insulted or offended by words, one has to internalize them and make the
decision for those words to hurt them. If one sees a Halloween costume that
offends them, the offended party has to decide
that they are offended. Granted, what is deemed an offensive costume may be a
symptom of some systematic oppression, but this merely means there is a chance
to have a debate with someone and possibly have the offender understand why a
costume is offensive. I might add to this that if a certain group currently
possesses more power than another group, I do not believe one should be
offended by past transgressions such as in the case of a Jew seeing a Nazi
Halloween costume. (I am open to debate on this point, though.)
Feelings are irrelevant in the face of more
pressing concerns. IS, economic inequality and climate change do not care about
the feelings of their victims. Nor is everyone special; it is quite clear the
opposite is true as we see it again and again every day and there would be no
CEOs or celebrities if everyone actually were important. I certainly understand
the desire to ignore inconvenient truths, but this doesn’t make feelings more
important than anything else out of
necessity. While I would agree that it is basically cruel to hurt someone’s
feelings intentionally, there should not be consequences for unintentional
harm, as Millennials would have it. While we can never know someone’s true
intention, neither can we know whether someone is truly having their feelings
hurt or trying to manipulate others to their advantage. Millennials should
beware the trappings of power; power corrupts and that corruption will wind up
hurting someone’s feelings. Don’t be a hypocrite by refusing to examine your
own beliefs, Millennials. If you want to be the stewards of the future, try to
avoid operating from false premises like all of your predecessors.
No comments:
Post a Comment