The Matrix Resurrections will certainly go down as the weakest entry in the franchise, probably, for several reasons: There isn’t much philosophy (no wtf mindbenders), too much time is spent on Neo’s life dealing with suppressed memories, too much nostalgia, action sequences that are lacking and when they aren’t it’s actually too much, some rather large plot holes, and Agent Smith’s ultimately trivial role in Neo, Trinity, and Smith’s, um, trinity.
To make a long story short, the story revolves around Neo
regaining his memories after having them suppressed after the machines resurrect
him and Trinity (following the events of The Matrix Revolutions) in order to
harvest the unique energy the two have together. Once Neo is free of the
Matrix, he must re-enter the program to save Trinity. Lots of kung fu and gunfire
ensues.
What does the movie get right? Neil Patrick Harris’ role is
a delight and the fight between Neo and Smith in the basement is actual pretty
good once Smith starts spewing the details. What the movie also gets right is in
casting cynicism on the modern age. Whereas the previous movies took it as a
given that a good percentage of enslaved human beings would rather subject themselves
to the truth than live a comfortable lie, Resurrections does an about face,
acknowledging the comfort our digital distractions have provided to make our
enslaved live more tolerable. Whereas the previous iteration of Morpheus
championed freedom of choice (which was acknowledged as a problem by the Architect),
the new Morpheus highlights time and again that choice is an illusion. Interestingly,
no one seems to mind. The movie doesn’t run with this theme though and chooses
(!) to focus on the power of love in overcoming the powers-that-be. Thus, the
spirit of the original trilogy is found wanting.
The Matrix Resurrection still makes a good point
here, one that can been seen quite readily in American culture, from politics
to entertainment. As the Analyst says in the new movie, “[People] don’t want
freedom or empowerment. They want to be controlled. They crave the comfort of
certainty.” He also says to Neo, “Do you know that hope and despair are nearly
identical is code?” implying that a little bit of hope mixed with a little bit
of despair is perfect for controlling people’s illusions. This is exactly the
state of the U.S. right now as the furthest Left fringes of American culture
battle the furthest elements of the Right. This culture war in the U.S. is all
or nothing, fully binary, ones and zeros just like in the Matrix.
Neither side will admit to being controlled, though, as both
fringes operate solely on emotion and cannot be reasoned with. When this is the
case it is easy – with tools such as the internet – to trap people in an echo
chamber from which they don’t want to escape because to do otherwise would be
psychologically uncomfortable. Confirmation bias is a tool of control.
Another point made be Resurrections which goes
hand-in-hand with the other message: So what if the Matrix isn’t real? Our
realities are fictions we’ve created out of (faulty) memories. It doesn’t
matter if we’re trapped in a fiction because we’re trapped in a fiction no
matter what. Our minds are not capable of capturing all of reality. Nor are memories
reliable, which is troubling since our behaviors are as largely derived from
our history as our biology. In fact, every time we recall a memory it becomes destabilized
within our wet-work and becomes prone to error. It should be alarming that
eyewitness testimony is allowed in court knowing what we know about how
memories work and how prone they are to influence. Being that we can’t trust
our memories, we’re forced to make up narratives that provide the illusion of
mental stability, because to admit you’re insane typically gets you physically
restrained in some manner or at least cast out of society. So, you might as
well choose a fiction that is most comforting to you so long as your basic freedom
and social needs are met.
Even knowing all this, too many people insist on championing
‘the truth.’ Anyone peddling ‘the truth’ is either an egomaniac or trying to
get something from you. Why did Neo want to know the truth? To quench his
desire for special knowledge. Why did Morpheus need to point out the truth to
Neo? Because Morpheus thought Neo could save humanity. Why are religious
zealots always trying to convert you? Because they seek power and control. No
religious zealot knocks on your door or flies planes into buildings for the
sake of the truth. People pay a great deal of lip service to the truth but this
often seems to be another tool of manipulation. It has to be because unless we’re
talking mathematics there is no truth. All we have are interpretations of
perceptions. Seriously ask yourself why the truth matters. It might matter
whereas our actual survival is at stake (man-eating lion = dangerous) but how
often is our literal survival threatened on a daily basis?
It appears large swaths of human civilization don’t want
freedom and don’t want reality. If they wanted freedom, they wouldn’t suffer
the constant and often successful attempts to control them. Even couples wouldn’t
marry if they wanted freedom as long-term marriages (in the modern world)
require compromise to be successful. People don’t want reality either, as
evidenced by the acceptance of outright lies and love of fantastical stories. There
are so many ways in which we are not free and so many ways in which we ignore
reality. Question yourself as to why you’ve accepted this and only then can you
begin to grasp the fundamentals, they only truths to be had.
The Matrix Resurrections won’t go down in cinematic
history as one of the greatest movies ever, or maybe it will. It depends on
what we want to believe. If it is what
we want to believe, it doesn’t really matter if its actually true or not. No
one’s survival depends on it. In the case of the Matrix, the people enslaved in
it are arguably better off staying where they are.
1 comment:
Certainly, Existentialists would deride those willing to suffer their lives in the Matrix as not living authentically, to which those very people would rightfully reply with, “So what?” How is an Existentialist supposed to reply to that? They can’t.
Post a Comment