Should
you be allowed to own a gun? This short questionnaire will answer this pressing
question.
1)Do
you believe in a deity?
2)We
know about Mohammed, but would Jesus have owned a gun?
3)Are
you a man?
4)Do
you think women should be subservient to men?
5)Do
you have an ex-girlfriend?
6)If
you’re a woman, has your husband ever cheated on you?
7)Do
you think abortion is murder?
8)Do
you think requiring classes before owning a gun is a ridiculous idea?
9)Do
you think society would be safer if everyone had a gun?
10)Do
you think society would be safer if no one had a gun?
11) Do you get road rage?
12) Are you a mean drunk?
13) Are you now or have you ever taken medication
to control your moods?
14) Do you take any illegal drugs besides
marijuana (if marijuana is still illegal in your backwards state)?
15) Do you drink Budweiser or Coors?
16) Do you live in any southern or ‘red’ state?
17) Is high school your highest level of
education?
18) Do you think the authors of the 2nd
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution had the vision to anticipate assault
weapons?
19) Does you think the “well-regulated militia” referred
to in the 2nd Amendment mean individuals who aren’t part of a
militia should own a gun?
20) Does the “well-regulated militia” referred to
in the 2nd Amendment mean you should be able to own a gun without
training?
21) Do you think President Obama is a Muslim?
22) Do you pronounce ‘government’ ‘gun’mint’?
23) Do you think the gub’mint is poisoning us with
chemtrails?
24) Do you think the gub’mint trying to mind
control the U.S. population by adding fluoride to tap water?
25) Do you own a gun for ‘protection’ and not because
you just like guns?
If you’ve
answered ‘yes’ to any of these questions, congratulations! you should probably
not own a gun because you have mental health issues. And that’s what this is
really about; owning or not owning guns isn’t ‘Merica’s problem, it’s the fact
that ‘Merica has some deep psychological problems. The mentally ill should not
own guns. End of story.
If there
is one sure fire way to spot an idiot, it would have to be the way some people
– usually conspiracy theorists (ironically also referred to as ‘truthers’) –
think they have figured out what some words actually
mean or how words are sometimes used against them.
For
example, I recall one particularly idiotic truther tried entertaining his
disturbingly large audience of 200 people with the revelation that the word
‘youngster’ is really referring to youngsters as being ‘young stars’ as human
beings are in fact beings of light. Nevermind that the etymology (the study of
the origin of words and their historical usage) of the word ‘young’ stems from the
Old English word ‘geong’ and Middle English word ‘yong’ which both refer to
someone as being from the early part of life or as possessing the looks of
someone who looks as though they belong to the early part of life. The suffix
‘-ster’ is also derived from Old and Middle English (and Proto-Germanic) and at
when added to a word refers to that thing as belonging to a specified group or
as doing something specific. Unsurprisingly, the word for a youngster is
‘enfant’ in French and ‘junge’ or ‘kind’ in German, words that have ZERO to do
with this truther’s claims about young people being the children of stars. Certainly
one can just make up out of thin air their own etymologies, but that doesn’t
mean their imaginings are true. [The same person completely ignored some key
definitions of ‘defense’ and intentionally narrowed the meaning of the word to
make a rather poor argument in their favor regarding imperialism.]
Then
there’s this ridiculous conspiracy theorist meme, depicted on the left. In actuality,
the word ‘govern-’ as it relates here is derived from the Old French word ‘governor’
which is itself derived from the Latin ‘gubernare,’ itself derived from the
Greek word ‘kybernan’ meaning to pilot or captain a ship. Meanwhile, ‘-ment’ was
imported from the French and Latin ‘-mentum’ and means the result of an action.
As one clever commenter wrote on English.stockexchange.com “If ‘-ment’
always referred to the mind, then a replacement would be a brain transplant,
punishment would be a headache, and an attachment would be a neural implant.”
More
recently, another truther tried to explain in her Youtube video that when
police ask you if you understand what
they are saying, answering ‘yes’ means you are giving them permission to stand over you. Nevermind that the word
comes from the Old English usage of ‘understandan’ which simply means to
perceive the meaning of words or ideas spoken to you. That’s it. If what this
conspiracy theorist is saying is true, then you simply have to tell police you
don’t understand them when they ask you if you understand and it’s like a
get-out-of-jail-free card!
Conspiracy
theorists / truthers (‘-ists’ and ‘-ers’ is used in a very similar fashion to
‘-ster’, btw) claim to want to make you think, but when you do and actually do
research the things the talk about and come to a ‘real’ conclusion, they’ll
have none of it. They’ll throw every ad hominin attack or straw man fallacy in
the book at you. Conspiracy theorists are alarmingly delusional and should be
hospitalized before they hurt someone or themselves. Or, we can invite them to
leave and start their own country. I know, I know, they’re too lazy for all
that. A few idiots ruin it for the rest of us.
[‘Idiot,’
by the way, comes from the Old French and Latin word ‘idiota’ meaning ‘ignorant
person.’ Unsurprisingly, the usage of idiot’ has risen exponentially with the advent
of the internet.]
Always
be wary of people claiming special knowledge of the divine…
Before
you watch the following video from this Youtube ‘truther,’ I have a disclaimer
to make: I used to be friends with the fellow in this video, very good friends
in high school. After years out of touch, we got back in touch via Facebook. As time wore on I noticed his beliefs weren’t what they once were, becoming
more and more insane. Personally knowing some of this person’s trials in recent
years, I’ve drawn the conclusion that he has chosen to accuse the world around
himself for his misfortunes since, as he is an egomaniac, he cannot accept the
misfortunes that befall him as anything that might be his own fault. He’s in
good company to that end. (Okay, not everything was his fault. I'll grant that.) While I believe that in his becoming a 'truther' he means well and I believe that he
believes he means well. But, this only brings to mind the old saying, “The road to Hell is
paved with good intentions.” Eventually I had
to halt our friendship on my end because I cannot abide by people so deeply
invested in their own bullshit. Plus, you can’t have a conversation with
someone who refuses to listen to your arguments even when they insist you should always draw your own conclusions. In a way, I’m mad at him for
that. Maybe you’ll see why. So, onto the video followed by my analysis of this person's madness.
Chris,
like many believers, presupposes the existence of God – it doesn’t matter in
which way – and twists information to agree with what he already believes.
Chris is not someone who doubted God’s existence and went looking for logical proofs
because if he did that, he would never have found that logical proof. Observe
the manner by which he looks towards the Bible for his evidence which just
happens to be the dominant scripture in the country he lives in. If he lived in
the Middle East, would he be saying, “If you read the Koran, you’ll see that
blah blah blah but it doesn’t mean what you’ve been taught”? Probably.
He’s
says about 666 being the number of Satan, “That could technically be true.” So
if it’s not technically true that means it’s not true at all. If 666 is not the
number of the Beast, human beings being carbon-based life forms is totally irrelevant.
So I really would love Chris to give proof that 666 is symbolic of some actual
and ultimate evil. ‘Cause if it’s not true – I’m pretty sure someone afraid of
the numbers three and six just made that up one day – this guy more crackers
than anyone gives him credit for.
Chris
then says – in talking about us as beings of light – says if you look at your
skin under a microscope, you’re made of atoms, that is, electrical components,
that is, light. Jeebus, someone get this guy a physics book; he can’t tell the
difference between an atom and a photon. Next, he says because we are beings of
light, we call our children “youngsters” while completely ignoring the word’s
Germanic and English roots, etymology being something Chris likes to disregard
so that he can make the most spurious conclusions regarding words sound like
the truth.
From
there, he holds up a symbol claiming that it represents God and his proof that
human beings have God in us is a picture of a newly fertilized embryo which, sure,
is vaguely similar but in actuality a two dimensional symbol of God looks
nothing like a three dimensional embryo. And, the so-called symbol of God could
just as easily be a hydrogen atom (or just about anything else) if you use your
imagination as much as Chris does.
Now if
you’ve watched the video up to this point, I know what you’re thinking: You don’t
understand Chris’ point because you don’t know what he’s saying; is he saying
that human beings are the Beast or that we have God inside of us? Is it both?
Someone call the logic police.
[By the
way, it’s worth noting here all kinds of stupid conclusions one could draw from
symbols. For example, I could argue that a triangle is the number of the Beast.
You see, a triangle has three angles which when added together make 180
degrees. If you add 1 + 8 + 0, you get 9. You can get 9 by adding 3 and 6. Or,
you could divide 18 (drop the zero) by 6 and you get 3. Either way, this is a
roundabout yet unmistakable way of saying that a triangle equals three sixes;
666.]
At the
end he says, “For all the people who think that you go nowhere when you die,
let me ask you, where do you come from? Something can’t come from nothing.” Ugh,
I can’t believe he said that. His logic is so unbelievably flawed on several
levels here. First of all, the former has nothing to do with the latter, Two, Chris
never bothers to apply this very logic to the existence of God. Granted, almost
every believer tries this ridiculous argument but that doesn’t make it true because
it keeps getting repeated. Three, even if something exists for us after we die,
this says absolutely zero about the existence of a god. Four, if the universe
has always existed, given enough time the existence of human beings is a 100%
certainty in exactly the same way that 12 monkeys at 12 typewriters, given an
infinite amount of time, will accidently reproduce the works of Shakespeare. Five,
how does he know about the origins of the universe? Was he there? I have to
throw that back at him since he uses this very counter-argument against a
critic in the comments section. (He also says in the comment section that we
are light; so what are we made of, carbon or light? He can’t seem to make up
his mind, probably because we are mostly made of water.)
As
always, Chris likes to open his videos by claiming he loves to make people
think, so I find it odd that he gets remarkably defensive when anyone disagrees
with his conclusions. (Or, I would find it odd if I didn’t already know he’s an
egomaniac.) If you disagree with Chris, he predictably will counter with a line
or two about how you are programmed by the Illuminati or otherwise metaphorically
‘asleep’ or ‘blind.’ Yet, he can’t see his own programming for what it is, the
programming that leads him to cherry-pick information from the Bible and other
sources to suit his needs. Chris will admonish you for being educated because somehow,
all formal education is bad, which makes sense for someone who couldn’t last
two months at one of New York’s most well-known party colleges. Yet, all the
knowledge he seeks out is magically legit. Wow!
Indeed,
be wary of those claiming special knowledge of the divine, especially those who,
in another video, tells you that all
forms of government are bad and then asks you to join his “Barnone Nation.” Are
you kidding me?
Gots me a BS in Philosophy. I am the author of "The New Adventures of Pi," a guide to God's' latest and most important revelation. When not promoting Pi-ism, I enjoy not believing current events, and critiquing philosophical and theological issues. I also enjoy writing fiction that dabbles in the surreal. The least you need to know is that I'm a legend in my own mind, just like you.